Williams v. Nuth

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Williams v. Nuth

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6536

FLOYD GLENN WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

EUGENE NUTH; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 96-2278-DKC)

Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 8, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Floyd Glenn Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Balti- more, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying

his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 & Supp. 1997),

and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's orders and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dis- miss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Nuth, No. CA-96-2278-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 5 & 24, 1997). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade-

quately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished