U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Wicker v. Pulliam

Wicker v. Pulliam
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 8, 1997

Wicker v. Pulliam

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6432

BENNIE WICKER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

VICTOR L. PULLIAM; CLYDE BOWEN, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-3647-3-17BC)

Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 8, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bennie Wicker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Stephen Pauley, LIDE, MONTGOMERY, POTTS & MEDLOCK, P.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wicker v. Pulliam, No. CA- 95-3647-3-17BC (D.S.C. Feb. 27, 1997). We dispense with oral argu- ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately pre- sented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.