Saunders v. Doe
Saunders v. Doe
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6393
STEVEN FITZGERALD SAUNDERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN DOE, Chief Jailer; EARLE D. ROBERTS, JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-97-66-3-MU)
Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 8, 1997
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Fitzgerald Saunders, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Saunders v. Doe, No. CA-97-66-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished