Garnett-Treadwell v. Rhodes
Garnett-Treadwell v. Rhodes
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6697
TAMI GARNETT-TREADWELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM RHODES, in his individual capacity,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-1014)
Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 8, 1997
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tami Garnett-Treadwell, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Christopher Sams, Barbara Tuck Lovell, SAMS & HAWKINS, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
her
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Garnett-Treadwell v. Rhodes, No. CA-95-1014 (E.D. Va. Apr. 4, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished