U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Brown v. Angelone

Brown v. Angelone
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 8, 1997

Brown v. Angelone

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7651

JAMES ARTHUR BROWN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

RONALD ANGELONE, Director; LONNIE M. SAUNDERS, Warden, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-273-AM)

Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 8, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Arthur Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Wirt Peebles Marks, IV, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel and general relief, deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Angelone, No. CA-96-273-AM (E.D.

Va. Sept. 26, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.