United States v. Omonogor
United States v. Omonogor
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6609
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DAVID HARRIS, a/k/a Inch,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CR-94- 384-L, CA-96-2973-L)
Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 7, 1997
Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States Attorney, Katharine Jacobs Armentrout, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Appellant
failed to provide a transcript of the evidentiary hearing at which
the court stated the reasons for denying relief. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2). Appellants proceeding in forma pauperis in § 2255
actions may be provided a transcript at government expense if the
transcript is needed to decide issues presented on appeal and the appeal is "not frivolous."
28 U.S.C. § 753(f) (1994). Because we
find that a transcript is not necessary, we deny Appellant's motion
for preparation of a transcript at government expense, deny a cer- tificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. We deny Appel-
lant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished