United States v. Grandison
United States v. Grandison
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6851
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ANTHONY GRANDISON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CR-79-189-H, CA-97-1359-H)
Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 21, 1997
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Grandison, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his peti-
tion for writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and
the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Grandison, Nos. CR-79-189-H; CA-97-1359-H (D. Md. May 1,
1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished