U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Riley v. Deeds

Riley v. Deeds
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 20, 1997

Riley v. Deeds

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6533

CHARLES RICHARD RILEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

GEORGE DEEDS; MIKE SPRADLING; RICHARD A.

YOUNG; RON ANGELONE; G. JOHNSON; UNKNOWN PARTIES, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-172-R)

Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 20, 1997

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Richard Riley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal- ability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Riley v. Deeds, No. CA-97-172-R (W.D. Va. Mar 18, 1997). Appellant's motion for a default judgment is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.