Venable v. NC Department Corr
Venable v. NC Department Corr
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7102
KEVIN CURTIS VENABLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; HAZEL KEITH, Manager Combined Records,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-96-269)
Submitted: October 14, 1997 Decided: October 29, 1997
Before HALL, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Curtis Venable, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's
recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
on the reasoning of the district court. Venable v. North Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-96-269 (E.D.N.C. July 8, 1997). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished