United States v. Falls
United States v. Falls
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6401
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROBERT LEWIS FALLS, a/k/a Robert Falls,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-93-5, CA-96-945-R)
Submitted: October 20, 1997 Decided: October 29, 1997
Before HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Lewis Falls, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Robert Falls seeks to appeal the district court's order and
order on reconsideration denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and
the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Falls, Nos. CR-93-5; CA-96-945-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 18, 1997; Jan. 21,
1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished