U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Roxberg

United States v. Roxberg
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 7, 1997

United States v. Roxberg

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7347

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

DONNA ROXBERG, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-236, CA-96-225-3)

Submitted: October 7, 1997 Decided: November 7, 1997

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donna Roxberg, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Mullen Frazier, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommenda- tion of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Roxberg, Nos. CR-93-236; CA-96-225-3 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 13, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W. 4557 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.