U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Higgins

United States v. Higgins
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 7, 1997

United States v. Higgins

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6835

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

ADOLPH ANTHONY HIGGINS, a/k/a Michael Augustus Bell, a/k/a Shawn Murray, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-94-182, CA-96-586-6)

Submitted: October 20, 1997 Decided: November 7, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adolph Anthony Higgins, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil- ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Higgins, Nos. CR-94-182; CA-96-586-6 (M.D.N.C. May 7, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.