Williams v. United States
Williams v. United States
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6485
DERRY LORENZO WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR- 92-126, CA-96-199-S)
Submitted: September 23, 1997 Decided: November 4, 1997
Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derry Lorenzo Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Douglas Bennett, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)) and his motion for recon- sideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Williams, Nos. CR-92-126; CA-96-199-S (D. Md. Mar.
1 & 27, 1996); Lindh v. Murphy, 117 S. Ct. 2059 (1997). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.