United States v. Wright
United States v. Wright
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6380
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CHESTER C. WRIGHT, a/k/a Frank Howard, Jr.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-46-F, CA-96-945-5-F)
Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 14, 1997
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chester C. Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Charles Johnson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wright, Nos. CR-92-46-F; CA-96-945-5-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 13, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished