United States v. Ladson
United States v. Ladson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6826
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DIRK LADSON, a/k/a Dezo, a/k/a Eugene Martin,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-93-162, CA-97-423-2)
Submitted: October 20, 1997 Decided: November 14, 1997
Before HALL, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dirk Ladson, Appellant Pro Se. Fernando Groene, Cathy Ellen Krinick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Ladson, Nos. CR-93-162; CA-97-423-2 (E.D. Va. May 27, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished