United States v. Jackson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Jackson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6523

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RONALD FLOYD JACKSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-254, CA-92-1794-4-2BC)

Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 14, 1997

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Floyd Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. William Earl Day, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 & Supp. 1997)

and the order declining to reconsider the judgment. We have re-

viewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and the order denying Appel- lant's post-judgment motion and find no reversible error. Accord-

ingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jackson, Nos. CR-90-254; CA-92-1794-4-2BC (D.S.C. Oct. 1, 1996;

Mar. 21, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished