United States v. Jackson
United States v. Jackson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6523
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RONALD FLOYD JACKSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-254, CA-92-1794-4-2BC)
Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 14, 1997
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Floyd Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. William Earl Day, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1997)
and the order declining to reconsider the judgment. We have re-
viewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and the order denying Appel- lant's post-judgment motion and find no reversible error. Accord-
ingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jackson, Nos. CR-90-254; CA-92-1794-4-2BC (D.S.C. Oct. 1, 1996;
Mar. 21, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished