Quick v. Atty Genl of NC
Quick v. Atty Genl of NC
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6764
PRENTISS QUICK,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NORTH CARO- LINA; KENNETH SETZER, Superintendent; FRANKLIN FREEMAN, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-709-2)
Submitted: October 31, 1997 Decided: November 14, 1997
Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Prentiss Quick, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
relief on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 &
Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability, deny Appellant's motion for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis and motion for appointment of counsel, and dismiss the
appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Quick v. Attorney Gen. of North Carolina, No. CA-96-709-2 (M.D.N.C. May 2, 1997). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished