Brandon v. Aramark Food Service

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Brandon v. Aramark Food Service

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6650

SHERMAN X. BRANDON; WILL 3X ANDERSON,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, INCORPORATED; EMILE R. CLOUD, Staff Chaplain,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-223-3)

Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 14, 1997

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sherman X. Brandon, Will 3X Anderson, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court's order declining to re-

consider the prior order transferring their civil rights action to

the District Court for the District of Columbia. We dismiss the ap-

peal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1291

(1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral

orders,

28 U.S.C. § 1292

(1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,

337 U.S. 541

(1949). The order here

appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory

or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished