Ives v. Adams
Ives v. Adams
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1881
FELICIA IVES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TOM ADAMS, Individually and as registered agent of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-97-290-A)
Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 13, 1997
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Felicia Ives, Appellant Pro Se. Martin Joseph Jaron, Jr., GINSBURG, FELDMAN & BRESS, CHARTERED, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying her
motion for a continuance of the hearing to consider the motion to
dismiss. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Ives v. Adams, No. CA-97-290-A (E.D. Va. June 23, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished