United States v. Lindsey
United States v. Lindsey
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6751
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
TOMMY LINDSEY, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-53-7, CA-96-939-F)
Submitted: October 21, 1997 Decided: November 12, 1997
Before HALL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tommy Lindsey, Appellant Pro Se. Jane H. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Bruce Charles Johnson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Lindsey, Nos. CR-93-53-7; CA-96-939-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 4, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.