Horton v. Gee
Horton v. Gee
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6944
BERNARD THOMAS HORTON,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
ARCHIE GEE, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 97-334)
Submitted: October 10, 1997 Decided: November 12, 1997
Before HALL, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernard Thomas Horton, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his petition filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp.
1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant Appellant's motion to amend his pleadings, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Horton v. Gee, No. CA-97-334 (D. Md. June 19, 1997). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished