Allen v. DOWCP

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Allen v. DOWCP

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1792

THELMA V. ALLEN, Widow of Thomas G. Allen,

Petitioner,

versus

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PRO- GRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (94-676-BLA)

Submitted: October 10, 1997 Decided: November 12, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thelma V. Allen, Petitioner Pro Se. Cathryn Celeste Helm, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision

and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black

lung benefits pursuant to

30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945

(West 1986 & Supp.

1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision

is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Allen v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, BRB No. 94-676-

BLA, (B.R.B. July 26, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished