Hines v. Fuller
Hines v. Fuller
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2174
JOHN L. HINES, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
JOYCE FULLER, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-1016-AW)
Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 21, 1997
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jennifer Evans, Ralph Edward Hall, Jr., Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant. Joyce Fuller, Appellee Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his action seeking the recovery of personal property. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hines v. Fuller, No. CA-94-1016-AW (D. Md. May 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.