United States v. Weiss
United States v. Weiss
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6491
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
ROY DANIEL WEISS, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CR-93-16, CR-93-24, CR-93-25, CA-96-269-1-V)
Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 19, 1997
Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roy Daniel Weiss, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Weiss, Nos. CR-93-16; CR-93-24; CR-93-25; CA-96-269-1-V (W.D.N.C Feb. 12, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.