U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Gravitt

United States v. Gravitt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 19, 1997

United States v. Gravitt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6599

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

WILLIAM S. GRAVITT, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CR-89-310-A, CA-96-1843-AM)

Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 19, 1997

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William S. Gravitt, Appellant Pro Se. Quincy Leon Ollison, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997) and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accord- ingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the ap- peal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Gravitt, Nos. CR-89-310-A; CA-96-1843-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 12 & 28, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.