Purpura v. Gammon & Grange PC
Purpura v. Gammon & Grange PC
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1763
NICHOLAS E. PURPURA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GAMMON & GRANGE PC; GEORGE R. GRANGE, II; PETER F. RATHBUN; H. ROBERT SHOWERS; MICHAEL J. WOODRUFF,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-96-759)
Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 19, 1997
Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nicholas E. Purpura, Appellant Pro Se. Danell Palladine Dean, ECCLESTON & WOLF, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing Appel-
lant's breach of contract, legal malpractice, and negligence
claims. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opin-
ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court and deny Appellant's motion to stay the appeal. Purpura v. Gammon & Grange PC, No. CA-96-759 (E.D. Va. Apr. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished