U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Chavis v. Bedsole

Chavis v. Bedsole
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 18, 1997

Chavis v. Bedsole

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7653

EDISON CHAVIS, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

MORRIS BEDSOLE; ANN CAMPBELL; EARL BUTLER, a/k/a Moose; DAN FORD; MORRIS SIMPSON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-95-700-5-BR)

Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: November 18, 1997

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edison Chavis, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Bobby Grey Deaver, Fayette- ville, North Carolina; Larry James McGlothlin, Fayetteville, North Carolina; Douglas Edward Canders, CUMBERLAND COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Chavis v. Bedsole, No. CA-95-700-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 13, 1996). We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.