United States v. Nelson
United States v. Nelson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7059
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RONALD NELSON, a/k/a Ronnie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-94-57-H, CA-97-263)
Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 17, 1997
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Jane H. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
Appellant raises issues for the first time on appeal, and we de-
cline to address these issues. See Muth v. United States,
1 F.3d 246, 250(4th Cir. 1993). We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nelson, Nos. CR-
94-57-H; CA-97-263 (E.D.N.C. June 25, 1997). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished