Mosley v. Richland County Ctr
Mosley v. Richland County Ctr
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7010
ALBERT MOSLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHLAND COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; JAMES A. MCCAULLEY, Director; SWANSON COMMISSARY SERVICE; RICHLAND COUNTY; HARRIETTE HALL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-97-731-3-19BC)
Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 17, 1997
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Albert Mosley, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing
without prejudice his civil rights action. The district court's
dismissal without prejudice is not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers' Local Union 392,
10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67(4th
Cir. 1993). A dismissal without prejudice could be final if "no
amendment [to the complaint] could cure defects in the plaintiff's
case."
Id. at 1067. In ascertaining whether a dismissal without prejudice is reviewable in this court, the court must determine
"whether the plaintiff could save his action by merely amending the
complaint."
Id. at 1066-67.
Appellant could refile this action and timely follow the dis-
trict court's orders regarding change of address and notification
of desire to prosecute the action, and demonstrating that the action is not repetitive. We dismiss the appeal for lack of juris-
diction because we find the dismissal without prejudice is not
appealable. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished