United States v. Thurston
United States v. Thurston
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6508
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ANDRE LAMONT THURSTON, a/k/a Tallman,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 97-6976
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
ANDRE LAMONT THURSTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-95-15-F, CA-97-35-2-F) Submitted: November 18, 1997 Decided: November 26, 1997
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
No. 97-6508 affirmed and No. 97-6976 dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andre Lamont Thurston, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr. Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
2 PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated cases, Appellant appeals in No. 97-6508
from the district court's order denying his post-conviction mo-
tions. In No. 97-6976 he seeks to appeal the district court's order
denying his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 &
Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm in
No. 97-6508 and deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss
appeal No. 97-6976 on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Thurston, Nos. CR-95-15-F; CA-97-35-2-F (E.D.N.C. Mar.
26, 1997; June 11, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
No. 97-6508 - AFFIRMED
No. 97-6976 - DISMISSED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished