Owens v. Graham

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Owens v. Graham

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6461

WILLIE J. OWENS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OFFICER GRAHAM; OFFICER ROGERS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-1363-4-12JI)

Submitted: October 31, 1997 Decided: November 26, 1997

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie J. Owens, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant, a South Carolina inmate, appeals the district

court's order denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) com-

plaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(d) (1994) (current version at 28

U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation. Accordingly, on the reasoning of the district

court, Owens v. Graham, No. CA-96-1363-4-12JI (D.S.C. Feb. 4, 1997), the Fourth Amendment claim (search) is dismissed without

prejudice, and the district court's denial of the Eighth Amendment

claim is affirmed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART AND AFFIRMED IN PART

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished