Hobbs v. Prince William Cnty
Hobbs v. Prince William Cnty
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1571
KAREN HOBBS; DIANE MARKMAN MCCLARD,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
COUNTY OF PRINCE WILLIAM,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-97-538-A)
Submitted: October 27, 1997 Decided: November 26, 1997
Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Beattie, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellants. Sharon Pandak, County Attorney, Stephen A. MacIsaac, Deputy County Attorney, PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY, Prince William, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Karen Hobbs and Diane Markman McClard appeal the denial of
their motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary
injunction in this action alleging in conclusory terms various acts
of gender discrimination by their employer, Prince William County
(Virginia). After a hearing, the district court denied the motion for interlocutory injunctive relief, principally for failure to
demonstrate any irreparable injury from the conduct seemingly chal-
lenged. Reviewing that decision for abuse of discretion, we have
carefully considered the briefs and record and, finding no abuse of discretion, affirm essentially on the reasoning of the district
court. Hobbs et al. v. Prince William County, C.A. No. 97-538-A (E.D. Va. April 21, 1997).
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished