United States v. Smith
United States v. Smith
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7164
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JULIAN ESTER MAE SMITH, a/k/a Pinky,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-5-2-V-5)
Submitted: October 21, 1997 Decided: November 25, 1997
Before HAMILTON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Julian Ester Mae Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Harry Thomas Church, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying for lack
of jurisdiction Appellant's motion for a reduction in sentence. We
have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. United States v. Smith, No. CR-96-5-2-V-5 (W.D.N.C. July 30, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished