O'Connell v. Montgomery County

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

O'Connell v. Montgomery County

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

______________

No. 96-1800 ______________

JAMES J. O'CONNELL, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND; CLARENCE EDWARDS, Chief of Police,

Defendants - Appellees.

______________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 93-733-PJM) ______________

Argued: July 16, 1997 Decided: November 24, 1997 ______________

Before MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge, BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge, and FOX, Chief United States District Judge for the Eastern District of North Carolina, sitting by designation. ______________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. ______________

ARGUED: Lori Elizabeth Kline, JACOBS, JACOBS & FARBER, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant. Bruce P. Sherman, Senior Assistant County Attorney, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees. ON BRIEF: Mindy G. Farber, Jack D. Isaacs, JACOBS, JACOBS & FARBER, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant. Charles W. Thompson, Jr., County Attorney, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees. ______________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM:

Appellant James J. O'Connell appeals the district court's

order granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees in this

action brought pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

, and Article 27, § 733

of the Maryland Code, "The Law Enforcement Officer's Bill of Rights." O'Connell claimed his civil rights were violated by his

transfers within the Montgomery County, Maryland, Police Depart-

ment, allegedly in retaliation for his invocation of his First

Amendment rights. His Complaint sought reinstatement, injunctive relief and compensatory, as well as punitive damages.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the rea-

soning of the district court. O'Connell v. Montgomery County, Maryland, No. CA-PJM-93-733 (D. Md. April 30, 1996).

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished