Lee v. Freeman
Lee v. Freeman
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7169
GREGORY MAURICE LEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FRANKLIN FREEMAN; LYNN PHILLIPS; THE UTILI- ZATION REVIEW BOARD; DOCTOR STOVER; DOCTOR HENRY; RICK JACKSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-96-128-3-MU)
Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: December 3, 1997
Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gregory Maurice Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Herre Erwin, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lee v. Freeman, No. CA-96-128-3-MU (W.D.N.C. July 14, 1997). We deny
Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-
ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished