Lee v. Freeman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Lee v. Freeman

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7169

GREGORY MAURICE LEE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FRANKLIN FREEMAN; LYNN PHILLIPS; THE UTILI- ZATION REVIEW BOARD; DOCTOR STOVER; DOCTOR HENRY; RICK JACKSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-96-128-3-MU)

Submitted: November 6, 1997 Decided: December 3, 1997

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Maurice Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Herre Erwin, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lee v. Freeman, No. CA-96-128-3-MU (W.D.N.C. July 14, 1997). We deny

Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate-

ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished