Cain v. Fontana

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Cain v. Fontana

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7056

ROBERT LEWIS CAIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CINDY L. FONTANA, L.P.N.,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

G. E. PIEROTTI, Sergeant; R. W. ROWLETTE, Captain,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-96-25-3)

Submitted: November 25, 1997 Decided: December 10, 1997

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lewis Cain, Appellant Pro Se. David Ernest Boelzner, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief

on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cain v. Fontana, No. CA-96-25-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 14 and July 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished