Cain v. Fontana
Cain v. Fontana
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7056
ROBERT LEWIS CAIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CINDY L. FONTANA, L.P.N.,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
G. E. PIEROTTI, Sergeant; R. W. ROWLETTE, Captain,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-96-25-3)
Submitted: November 25, 1997 Decided: December 10, 1997
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lewis Cain, Appellant Pro Se. David Ernest Boelzner, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief
on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cain v. Fontana, No. CA-96-25-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 14 and July 3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished