Winton v. Am-Pro Protective
Winton v. Am-Pro Protective
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1546
GARY J. WINTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
AM-PRO PROTECTIVE AGENCY, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-96-1119-A)
Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 9, 1997
Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary J. Winton, Appellant Pro Se. Lance A. Mueller, AM-PRO PROTECTIVE AGENCY, INC., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's orders granting summary
judgment to Defendant in this action alleging employment discrim-
ination and denying Appellant's motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Winton v. Am-Pro Protective Agy., No. CA-96-1119-A (E.D. Va. Mar. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished