Wicks v. Apfel, Commissioner

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Wicks v. Apfel, Commissioner

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1743

LUZ D. WICKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-96-1022-4-6JI)

Submitted: October 28, 1997 Decided: December 9, 1997

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luz D. Wicks, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Lamar Paxton, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order affirming the

decision of the Commissioner which denied Appellant disability

insurance benefits but granted supplemental insurance benefits. We

have reviewed the record and the district court's order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Wicks v. Apfel, No. CA-96-1022-4-6JI (D.S.C. May 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-

tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished