Wicks v. Apfel, Commissioner
Wicks v. Apfel, Commissioner
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-1743
LUZ D. WICKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-96-1022-4-6JI)
Submitted: October 28, 1997 Decided: December 9, 1997
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Luz D. Wicks, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Lamar Paxton, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order affirming the
decision of the Commissioner which denied Appellant disability
insurance benefits but granted supplemental insurance benefits. We
have reviewed the record and the district court's order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Wicks v. Apfel, No. CA-96-1022-4-6JI (D.S.C. May 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished