United States v. Locke
United States v. Locke
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6049
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HERLEY L. LOCKE, a/k/a Pooh,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-94-65-H)
Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 9, 1997
Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herley L. Locke, Appellant Pro Se. John Howarth Bennett, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his
motion for reduction of sentence and motion to modify term of
imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Locke, No. CR-94-65-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished