U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

United States v. Dixon

United States v. Dixon
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 9, 1997

United States v. Dixon

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7335

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

HERBERT PERRY DIXON, JR., Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-153, CA-96-36)

Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 9, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herbert Perry Dixon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael James Cummings, COMMONWEALTH'S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dixon, Nos. CR-93-153; CA-96-36 (E.D. Va. May 3, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.