U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Dehoney v. Barclays Amer Mort

Dehoney v. Barclays Amer Mort
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 9, 1997

Dehoney v. Barclays Amer Mort

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1535

MICHAEL F. DEHONEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

BARCLAYS AMERICAN MORTGAGE COMPANY, and all affiliated/subordinate financial subsidiary fiduciaries to include Norwest Mortgage Company, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-3510-4-21-BE)

Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 9, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Alan Jacobs, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, Columbia, South Carolina; Thornwell Forrest Sowell, III, SOWELL, TODD, LAFFITTE, BEARD & WATSON, L.L.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dehoney v. Barclays American Mortgage Co., No. CA-94-3510-4- 21BE (D.S.C. Apr. 16, 1997). Further we deny Appellant's motions for stay of judgment pending appeal and Appellee's motion for a show cause order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.