U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Nunley v. DOWCP

Nunley v. DOWCP
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 15, 1997

Nunley v. DOWCP

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2076

PAT NUNLEY, Administrix of the estate of Laura Johnson, deceased widow of Howard Johnson, Petitioner, versus

DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order for the Benefits Review Board. (96-1259-BLA)

Submitted: December 2, 1997 Decided: December 15, 1997

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pat Nunley, Petitioner Pro Se. Rita A. Roppolo, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.; Ramesh Murthy, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE, Abingdon, Virginia, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's deci- sion and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without rever- sible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board.

Johnson v. Clinchfield Coal Co., BRB No. 96-1259-BLA (B.R.B. June 27, 1997). We have reviewed the remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.