United States v. Wilson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Wilson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6469

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BRINSTON WILSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-92-328, CA-96-2184-7-20)

Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 24, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brinston Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, As- sistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Brinston Wilson seeks to appeal the district court's order de-

nying his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 & Supp.

1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. United States v. Wilson, Nos. CR-92-328; CA-96-2184-7- 20 (D.S.C. Mar. 20, 1997). In light of our disposition of this

case, Wilson's motion for a default judgment is denied. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished