United States v. Prats
United States v. Prats
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6842
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
FREDDY PRATS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-82-43-BR, CA-97-148-5-1-BR)
Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 24, 1997
Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Freddy Prats, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-
pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Prats, Nos. CR-82-43-BR; CA-97-148-5-1-BR (E.D.N.C. May 28, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion to direct the
district court to provide him with trial transcripts. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished