U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1997

Hughes v. De Walt

Hughes v. De Walt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 24, 1997

Hughes v. De Walt

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6754

CHRISTOPHER LYMAN HUGHES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

WARDEN DE WALT, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-90-92-G, CA-97-398-AM)

Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 24, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Lyman Hughes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Christopher Hughes seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).* We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hughes v. De Walt, Nos. CR-90-92-G; CA-97- 398-AM (E.D. Va. May 5, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process.

DISMISSED

* While Hughes originally filed for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994), the district court properly construed his action as a § 2255 motion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.