Roach v. Burkhart
Roach v. Burkhart
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2097
DENNIS M. ROACH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WARREN BURKHART,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-2755-8-13AK)
Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 23, 1997
Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis M. Roach, Appellant Pro Se. Bradley Alan Norton, BALLENGER, FEDDER, CAIN & NORTON, Seneca, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his
civil action as barred by the statute of limitations. We have
reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Roach v. Burkhart, No. CA-96-2755-8-13AK (D.S.C. July 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished