United States v. Diggs
United States v. Diggs
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7275
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HAROLD DIGGS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief Dis- trict Judge. (CR-91-65, CA-97-91-5-BO)
Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 31, 1997
Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harold Diggs, Appellant Pro Se. Jane H. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of
appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. United States v. Diggs, Nos. CR-91-65; CA-97-91-5-BO (E.D.N.C. July 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished