United States v. Brown
United States v. Brown
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6980
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
PHILIP G. BROWN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (CR-94-8)
Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 30, 1997
Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Philip G. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a)(1)(1994), to abolish the supervised release portion of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Brown, No. CR-94-8 (N.D.W. Va. July 9, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.