Law v. Lilly

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Law v. Lilly

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6993

BARRY LAW,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

LINDA LILLY, City Insurance (Division of Risk); DAVID TORBORG, Insurance Coordination, City of Danville; MAJOR COLEMAN, Danville Jail; SERGEANT CHILDRESS, Danville Jail, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-449-R)

Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 30, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry Law, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion, dismissing the action because it

failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. 1997), and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Law v. Lilly, No. CA-97-449-R (W.D. Va. July 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished