Law v. Lilly
Law v. Lilly
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6993
BARRY LAW,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LINDA LILLY, City Insurance (Division of Risk); DAVID TORBORG, Insurance Coordination, City of Danville; MAJOR COLEMAN, Danville Jail; SERGEANT CHILDRESS, Danville Jail, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-449-R)
Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 30, 1997
Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barry Law, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on
his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record
and the district court's opinion, dismissing the action because it
failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (West Supp. 1997), and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Law v. Lilly, No. CA-97-449-R (W.D. Va. July 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished