U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1998

Estate of Ives v. Metropolitan Life

Estate of Ives v. Metropolitan Life
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 9, 1998

Estate of Ives v. Metropolitan Life

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2032

ESTATE OF VERTIE F. IVES, BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR FELICIA IVES; ESTATE OF MAZIE J. IVES, BY ITS ADMINISTRATOR FELICIA IVES; FELICIA IVES, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-95-1751-A)

Submitted: November 25, 1997 Decided: January 9, 1998

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Estate of Vertie F. Ives, Estate of Mazie J. Ives, Felicia Ives, Appellants Pro Se. Lawrence Keith Wolff, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSUR- ANCE COMPANY, New York, New York; Martin Joseph Jaron, Jr., GINS- BURG, FELDMAN & BRESS, CHARTERED, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. We find that the district court correctly granted summary judgment because the Appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence so that the record taken as a whole could lead a rational trier of fact to find for Appellant. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247-49 (1986). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.